AN ELECTRONIC NEWSLETTER ABOUT ENVIRONMENT,
RENEWABLE RESOURCE TECHNOLOGY,
AND RELATED TOPICS
By BOOTSTRAP PRESS, INC.
BETHESDA, MD
JJGREENBARON@VERIZON.NET
FOR COMMENTS: GREEN_BARON99.MUENCHHAUSEN@BLOGGER.COM
===============================================================
AUGUST 9, 2007
===============================================================
WELCOME!
The Green Baron welcomes one and all who take the time to read Muenchhausen. He aims to “tell it like it is” as much as possible, and avoid advocacy and ideological positions. There are enough of those to go around in other publications.
The Green Baron also welcomes comments from anyone who may read Muenchhausen. Please send comments to the e-mail address above or to Green_Baron99.muenchhausen@blogger.com.
ENVIRONMENT AND ECONOMICS? ENVIRONMENT VS. ECONOMICS?
During his career (1973-1994) with the magazine/journal Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T), and even thereafter, The Green Baron (TGB) often heard environmental experts and, to be sure, advocates, maintain that environmental progress and economic growth could be compatible or made compatible. Fain would TGB believe that to be true, and perhaps it may be, if one considers the long run. However, to quote the late economist John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946), "In the long run, we are all dead." About which, some musings:
One has but to look at the recent economy vs. environment record of the People's Republic of China (PRC). For instance, this June, China rejected caps on greenhouse gas emissions as "threat to economic growth" (1). Ma Kai, Minister of China's National Development and Reform Commission, a cabinet-level agency, explained that it "is neither fair nor acceptable to us to impose too early, too abruptly, or too bluntly measures which one would ask of developed countries."
The Chinese government did list a series of environmental goals it seeks to achieve by 2010, from raising public awareness about conservation to accelerating research and development. But it will take few or no initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, at least in the near future. Bear in mind that China currently is exempt from provisions of the Kyoto Protocol of December 1997 (which, to be fair, the United States also refused to ratify. However, numerous US governmental and private interests are taking voluntary measures to reduce such emissions, and some individual states are mandating reductions.)
Chinese officials make quite clear that China will not even consider environmental measures not in its interest, because these would interfere with China's efforts to "modernize." Chinese officials frequently note that China has about 20% of the world's population, but produces only 15% of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. By contrast, they add, the US has 5% of the world's population, but generates 25% of the world's CO2 output. TGB will say this for those Chinese officials: They are not mincing any words!
ECONOMIC GAIN WITHOUT FREEDOM
It often is said that a large degree of individual freedom is a sine qua non for the furtherance of economic gain and prosperity. The government of the People's Republic of China has demonstrated conclusively that this need not be the case (2). Indeed, according to James Mann, author-in-residence at The Johns Hopkins University, a regime is quite able to have economic prosperity while effectively suppressing organized opposition and not even bothering to hold fair, meaningful elections. Mann suggests that China's political-economic model offers hope not only to isolated dictatorships such as Syria, Myanmar (Burma), or Zimbabwe, but also to leaders of countries such as Venezuela and Cuba.
What, one might ask, has this to do with environmental protection and improvement, sustained development, and such like? It becomes clear that governments such as that of China can crush environmental opposition to breakneck industrial development and megaprojects such as dams; the Three Gorges Dam on the Yang-tze River is a case in point. It has just been reported that the Yang-tze River dolphin seems to have been driven to extinction almost solely through human activity.
REFERENCES:
1. Fan, M. "China Outlines Modest Environmental Goals". The Washington Post, June 5, 2007, p. A14.
2. Mann, J. "A Shining Model of Wealth without Liberty". The Washington Post, May 20, 2007, p. B1.
WHAT IS BOOTSTRAP PRESS?
Bootstrap Press is a nonprofit organization founded in Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A., to promote the development and management of technology and businesses based on renewable resources. We also encourage the preservation of our Earth's natural habitats and its plant and animal species. So do a lot of other organizations, and more power to them for doing so!
Bootstrap Press is different because its members believe that the development of renewable resources and the preservation of habitats and species are receiving far more lip service than the financial and technical support needed to achieve these goals. We also think they will continue to be subjects of more talk than action until someone can show how renewable resources and the diversity of biological species can be the basis for potentially profitable businesses as well as a matter of ethics. Bootstrap Press intends to provide a forum for the discussion of how to build up such business, and of related topics.
There's one more thing we should mention about Muenchhausen and Bootstrap Press. We try to present only the scientific and technical facts that are correct to the best of our knowledge, belief, and good faith. It is up to Muenchhausen's readers to draw their own conclusions and make their own judgments.
NOTE: The mention of a product or service in Muenchhausen is in no way to be regarded as an endorsement of that product or service by Muenchhausen, Bootstrap Press, the Green Baron, or any other contributor to Muenchhausen. Also, the views expressed in Muenchhausen are The Green Baron’s own, and are based on the best of his knowledge, belief, and good faith.
Labels: Environment vs. economics; economic gain without liberty; extinction of a species







